Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TR2 and C++0x heads up

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 16:46:34

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:03d401c54a75$d3a71a20$6401a8c0_at_pdimov2...
>> If you ask me for my personal opinion: I have little use for the
>> Conversion and the Checking policies. However I do need an easier
>> way of specifying a
>
> Checking policy could be very convenient for implementing Debug only
> extra checking. Similar to STLPort debug mode. Conversion is just a
> matter of satisfying legacy interfaces.

Yes, I know, but I still have little use for them. :-) Different people 
would probably allocate a budget of four policies differently. Even 
policy-based designs can't please everyone. :-)