Re: [boost] Re: TR2 and C++0x heads up

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 20:56:16

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:35:28 +0000, Iain K. Hanson wrote

> Could you or Beman elaborate on the position of a boost member who 
> is not a member of the comittee and the process that they can follow 
> for making a proposal to the committee without being a member.
> 
> Are we at a disadvantage?

The committee members can confirm this, but as I recall I was told they would
put me on the LWG reflector if I submitted a proposal.  So my understanding is
that if there is a need you are included even if you aren't a committee
member.  Taking your question another way, John Maddock wrote at least a
couple of the accepted TR1 proposals and he isn't a committtee member -- so
maybe it is an advantage ;-)

Jeff