|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 16:23:41
Walter Landry <wlandry_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Bjørn Roald <bjorn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> My view is very different from yours. The last thing that I want to
> do when I am installing a new program is learn about a new build
> system. On Unix, the install procedure should really be "configure ;
> make ; make install". There is really no excuse for that not to be
> the case.
I agree we should meet platform expectations. If make calls bjam or
whatever, then so be it.
> I would expect a binary installer on Windows.
I agree.
> In fact, there should be a list of binary packages on the front
> page. If they don't exist for a platform (OS X?), they need to be
> built and offered there.
Well, they only need to be built and offered if there is enough demand
to get someone to support it ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk