From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-29 09:37:45
On Apr 25, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | > I would really hate to redo my corrections twice.
> | What corrections?
> If I understand this correctly, then there will exists two branches
> and any
> patch to one of them would need to go into the other too.
Only if you're doing new-feature development at the same time that
you're fixing bugs. For the main trunk of CVS (HEAD), only bug fixes
are allowed. If you are developing new features, create a branch and
work on those new features there... bug fixes will likely have to go on
both branches. However, I would prefer that effort be spent fixing bugs
rather than developing new features, so that we can get this release
out the door.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk