From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-30 07:51:29
Matt Hurd wrote:
>>Howard Hinnant <hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>On Apr 28, 2005, at 9:31 PM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>>>What happens when you request a shared lock from a non-shared mutex?
>>>It just gives you an exclusive lock?
>>Imho, a compile time error.
> I disagree, which suggests perhaps it should be configurable to make
> us both happy.
I can see both sides of the argument being supported by numbers of
people, so perhaps this would be a good solution. It would fit with my
strategy of trying to add more configurability.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk