Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-30 13:30:27

>> Gennadiy: to do what you suggest would seem to me to require (a) no
>> buffering and (b) an interface which is likely not thread-safe. Or am
>> I missing something.
> Gennadiy, correct me if I'm wrong but as you wrote your post as a reply
> to mine, I can see a connection: You seem to prefer the unbuffered
> logging to have at least the partial information before an exception
> occurs and to avoid complexity in the implementation of the logging
> library by avoiding the buffering code, right?

I did not had any buffering in mind. See my other post. May be you could
explain me more how buffering affect order of log entries in stream.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at