[boost] Re: Logging Library -- Formal Review Request

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-30 13:30:27

>> Gennadiy: to do what you suggest would seem to me to require (a) no
>> buffering and (b) an interface which is likely not thread-safe.  Or am
>> I missing something.
>
> Gennadiy, correct me if I'm wrong but as you wrote your post as a reply
> to mine, I can see a connection: You seem to prefer the unbuffered
> logging to have at least the partial information before an exception
> occurs and to avoid complexity in the implementation of the logging
> library by avoiding the buffering code, right?

I did not had any buffering in mind. See my other post. May be you could 
explain me more how buffering affect order of log entries in stream.

Gennadiy