From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-02 19:42:13
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> True, but much of this is only needed for the *const* rvalue stuff.
>>> If there were general agreement that there's fat to trim (is there?),
>>> dropping *const* rvalue support would be an easy target.
>> Don't do it! I plan to write some functions that return const
>> rvalues. Plus, Scott Meyers recommends it, so you'll encounter it.
> Const rvalues aren't movable, though. :-)
I think you could make them move, couldn't you?
Anyway, these const rvalues are views and proxies, so you can't gain
anything by moving: it would be the same as copying.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk