Re: [boost] Formal Review: FOREACH macro

From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-03 04:49:35

In-Reply-To: <d4j89a$cd7$1_at_[hidden]>
gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden] (Gennadiy Rozental) wrote (abridged):
> BOOST_FOREACH

By the way, is there a rationale for the name? I'd have expected 
BOOST_FOR_EACH, with a word separator between FOR and EACH because, well 
they are separate words. This also matches the precedent of std::for_each. 
Word separators are especially important for names that are all in 
capitals.

Is there a compelling reason to omit the second underline?

-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.