Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-03 04:49:35

In-Reply-To: <d4j89a$cd7$1_at_[hidden]>
gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden] (Gennadiy Rozental) wrote (abridged):

By the way, is there a rationale for the name? I'd have expected
BOOST_FOR_EACH, with a word separator between FOR and EACH because, well
they are separate words. This also matches the precedent of std::for_each.
Word separators are especially important for names that are all in

Is there a compelling reason to omit the second underline?

-- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at