From: Joel (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-04 21:21:57
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email)"
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>... So I think it's entirely reasonable that building boost might
>>generate C++ using *other* tools. I bet such an approach would lead to
>>more maintainable and easy-to-understand code (only requiring knowledge
>>of general tools that should be in a boost developer's toolchest anyway)
>>instead of using the PP programming paradigm, of which learning I
>>believe is less rewarding.
> Interesting... Can you provide an example of how would such a tool generate
> C++ based on the library user input... Lets just start with the simplest
> one: the user wants to set maximum size of the mpl::vector<> to 50... Can
> you explain how that would be achieved with an external tool?
For example, we can have a python script that will generate header
files for vector0 .. vector50 given some user supplied configs (with
defaults). I remember some people doing that before boost PP became
the norm (e.g. boost.python).
However... see my other post.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk