From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-05 11:10:18
> Given the current state of the test matrix and the low risk/high reward,
> I'd say that it's worth it, especially if you can add it in a way that is
> easily turned off at the flip of a switch/comment/define.
It's handled by a new preprocessor block in
boost/type_traits/intrinsics.hpp: there are some new intrinsics added
(because VC8 goes further than our previous best performer: MWCW), and quite
a few tests have had to be updated (the new intrinsics actually caught quite
a few bugs in our current test cases). But basically yes, it can all be
disabled by just commenting out a few lines in intrinsics.hpp. The biggest
danger is that I've messed up the preprocessor logic somewhere - but if I
have it doesn't affect any compiler I've tested with so far.
> Where is the instrinsic support documented, BTW?
Do you mean Microsoft's documentation
(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/ms177194(en-us,vs.80).aspx) or the
type_traits docs? If the latter, then it's all handled by comments inside
boost/type_traits/intrinsics.hpp, but it probably should be in the "real"
docs as well, I also need to mention that VC8 handles various traits
correctly (currently only MWCW gets a mention for that), but I won't commit
changes to the docs until I'm sure about the code: type_traits changes do
have the habit of jumping up and biting you at the slightest opportunity :-(
Anyway I'll go ahead with the change, and if it bytes back too badly, I'll
just revert the lot.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk