[boost] Re: Singleton Review: GCC compiler errors

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-09 14:02:22

Jason Hise wrote:
 >
> AFAIK, a pure virtual function is the only way to automatically make any 
> derived classes un-instantiable.
> 

Have you considered a protected (or even private if you want complete 
uninstantiability) constructor ?

Regards,

Tobias