From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 11:19:01
From: "Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]>
> "Dan Rosen" wrote:
> > 1. Creator policy is redundant with the standard Allocator concept, I
> > think. Though the standard Allocator concept has some subtle, tricky
> > semantics, I think it's nevertheless worth using: that would permit
> > interoperability with existing allocator implementations.
> Thinking it again: you are likely right here.
> Handling of constructor arguments could be separated
> from allocation.
I don't know about that, but perhaps an adapter could be provided
to make a standard allocator look like a creator?
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk