Re: [boost] Re: [Formal review] Singleton library

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 11:19:01

From: "Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]>
> "Dan Rosen" wrote:
> 
> > 1. Creator policy is redundant with the standard Allocator concept, I
> > think. Though the standard Allocator concept has some subtle, tricky
> > semantics, I think it's nevertheless worth using: that would permit
> > interoperability with existing allocator implementations.
> >
> Thinking it again: you are likely right here.
> 
> Handling of constructor arguments could be separated
> from allocation.

I don't know about that, but perhaps an adapter could be provided
to make a standard allocator look like a creator?

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;