Re: [boost] Re: Re: [gcc regressions] what's up with them

From: Stefan Strasser (sstrasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 13:08:45

Thorsten Ottosen schrieb:
> "Jonathan Wakely" <cow_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:20050510111935.GA96950_at_compsoc.man.ac.uk...
> | On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:13:07PM +0200, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> |
> | > "Jonathan Wakely" <cow_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | > |
> | > | Now I've had time to look at it I've found a bug in libstdc++'s debug
> | > | mode where std::iterator is unqualified and so not found when
> | > | vector<bool> is not in std.
> | > |
> | > | I'll fix it in GCC a.s.a.p.
> | >
> | > Thanks! :-)
> |
> | I see this (and similar problems) have now been fixed in GCC's CVS,
> | see PR 18604.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Where should I see PR ...?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18604

------ Additional Comment #2 From Giovanni Bajo  2004-12-30 11:59 
[reply] -------

This affects Boost, I'm bumping the priority.

:)

-- 
Stefan Strasser