From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 16:30:15
On May 10, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Pavol Droba wrote:
> As far as I can tell, it seems, that bcc does not handle safe-bool
> idiom well. Problem leads to
> boost::iterator_range (currently present in Boost.Range)
We've run into this before. You need to implement an "operator!".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk