From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 17:24:39
Daniel Wallin wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Yes, I'm interested. I'm pretty comfortable implementing the current
>> feature set with above syntax. I'd certainly be interested in you
>> ideas about extensibility, however.
> Here's some PP-code that allows a pretty optimal syntax.
Thanks, Daniel! I wasn't sure how to handle cv-qualifiers, and so was pretty
much resigned to using CONST_FN or something like that, and ignoring volatile in
the macro-based IDL.
One thing that remains is to figure out how to handle base interface lists and
member typedefs. Any suggestions would be very welcome.
> Works with
> GCC and probably nothing else, but maybe it's possible to port to
> other preprocessors.
I'll definitely need help with that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk