|
|
Boost : |
From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 02:47:07
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:56:21PM -0600, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> Pavol Droba wrote:
>
> > However I can see a way how to resolve a problem with future unicode
> > character classes. Simple trait class can do the job nicely.
>
> This works if the designated character types are classes, or new integral types.
> But if they're typedefs for existing types, e.g. unsigned int, traits classes
> won't be able to determine the intended use.
>
That's true. Maybe a proposed "strong typedef" can help here in the furure.
Pavol
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk