From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 03:45:49
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Russell Hind wrote:
> Pavol Droba wrote:
> >As far as I can tell, it seems, that bcc does not handle safe-bool idiom
> >well. Problem leads to boost::iterator_range (currently present in
> Here is a modification of the patch. It doesn't fix the operator!
> errors (David Abrahams pointed out a possible solution for this, can you
> add this)?
I'm not aware of it. Can you point where I can find it?
> These are the only errors I'm getting now in the test log (see attached).
> Will this be applied?
I will definitely apply your patches. Thanks very much for your efford.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk