Re: [boost] Re: [string_algo] patch for bcc32

From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 03:45:49

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Russell Hind wrote:
> Pavol Droba wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >As far as I can tell, it seems, that bcc does not handle safe-bool idiom 
> >well. Problem leads to boost::iterator_range (currently present in 
> >Boost.Range)
> >
> 
> Here is a modification of the patch.  It doesn't fix the operator! 
> errors (David Abrahams pointed out a possible solution for this, can you 
> add this)?
> 

I'm not aware of it. Can you point where I can find it?

> These are the only errors I'm getting now in the test log (see attached).
> 
> Will this be applied?

I will definitely apply your patches. Thanks very much for your efford.

Regards,
Pavol.