From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 05:24:29
"Deane Yang" <deane_yang_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>I very much appreciate Daniel's efforts on this, but I do get the impression
>that it still needs more testing and tweaking.
> Couldn't boost first accept a constants library that has an
> easier-to-implement modern C++ interface (parentheses and all), so that we can
> all start using it sooner rather than later, and then incorporate Daniel's
> interface at a later date?
How about ' math constants' staying with the simplest approach (eg function)
while Daniel Freys 'smart constants' are made into a separate proposal?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk