Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 12:02:08


Pavol Droba wrote:

> And correct me if I'm wrong, but from the C++ programmer perspecive,
> char[] is in 90% cases used as a string literal.

This has not been my experience. char[] is usually a char[] in my code, a
character buffer with a fixed size, as I tried to show with the swprintf
example. (Sometimes it's a short array of characters, typically 4, but this
is rare.)

String literals typically decay to char const* the moment they are used.

Of course my experience may be unusual.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk