From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-18 13:54:30
Rene Rivera wrote:
> > Do we have already a similar thing somewhere in the inspect
> tool (I'm
> > asking to avoid inventing a new special syntax if there
> already exists one ;-)?
> Not explicitly.. it's a very simple program :-)
> > Otherwise I'd go for adding the recognition of a special string
> > somewhere in the file:
> > BoostInspect:notab
> > suppressing the -tab check for this particular file.
> Additionally this
> > is extensible in the future, if needed.
> > Comments?
> To take a cue from QuickBook...
> [boostinspect notab]
> But yes.. that's a good way of doing it.
I added the checking for boostinspect:notab which may be easily added to any
comments section in the target file.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk