From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-26 15:24:32
> | I couldn't incorporate all possible predicates
> | into library. Instead I provide generic tool. If you need this
> frequently in
> | some test module you could define one yourself.
> then why did you provide CHECK_EQUAL ? Afterall, it can be done with
> the generic tool.
equality comparison is most frequently used assertions.
> surely it wouldn't be too hard to write first hand tools for ==, !=, <, <=
> to give users the most pleasent experience ? (> and >= is not needed as we
> reverse the arguments)
We need to set a line somewhere. But I don't mind adding several more
predefined tools, if there are enough people interested in this. Anyone to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk