Re: [boost] [type traits] is_abstract expected failures

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-23 23:54:34

> The following compilers are failing is_abstract_test:
>   - cw-9_5-darwin
>   - gcc-3_3-darwin
>   - cw-9_4
>
>  From the list of compilers that are already expected to fail this test 
> (include CW 9.3 and GCC 3.3.x), I think they should be marked as known 
> failures and will do so unless anyone objects.

Please do so if you haven't already.

I thought I had type traits all marked up, but folks keep adding new 
toolsets :-(

John.