From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-24 00:11:44
> Can arguments to compressed_pair be const-qualified? The
> documentation only lists this restriction:
> Note that compressed_pair can not be instantiated if either of the
> template arguments is a union type, unless there is compiler support
> for boost::is_union, or if boost::is_union is specialised for the
> union type.
> I believe I am getting an error from Intel C++ when an argument to
> compressed_pair is const. The question is whether we need a
> workaround in compressed_pair.hpp or a change to the html
OK, the following:
boost::compressed_pair<const int, long> cp2;
Gives me a compiler error with VC7.1 (it should as well, but it's not really
a compressed_pair issue).
Where are this:
boost::compressed_pair<const int, long> cp2(0); compiles as expected.
boost::compressed_pair<const myclass, long> cp2;
as long as myclass has a user-defined default constructor.
That's all exactly what I would expect, what am I missing?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk