|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-29 12:05:27
Loïc Joly <loic.actarus.joly_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams a écrit :
>
>> I don't think we need to do that kind of diligence. If we have heard
>> from someone who we have reasonable confidence works for the company,
>> that should be enough. If a company asks us to, we can always remove
>> mention from the site. I do think it would be wrong to use a logo
>> without special permission from someone in authority, but companies
>> don't have any special right to control information about their use of
>> Boost.
>
> Well, I'm not sure, but I think that many companies have some very
> strict policies about how their names are used,
In commercial advertising, yes. In general, no. I can write
practically anything I want to about Microsoft, and use their name as
much as I want, without fear of running afoul of their legal rights.
> and even more their logos.
Yes, the logo is a copyrighted image, and can only be reproduced with
the company's permission.
> I use boost at work in my company. But I guess that if I told you to
> use this company name, without checking with the company lawers and
> the communication department, I would get into trouble.
But that's your problem, not Boost's. It's between you and your
company.
> What might happen is that many small companies would agree easily, but
> very few big companies, where administrative stuff is more
> "brazil-like".
One reason not to ask for permission ;-)
> I'm not sure wether seing many name I've never heard of and no known
> name would be good or bad advertising. So I suggest that before
> getting such a page online, it would be good to wait until there are
> enough names, with some well knows ones.
You'll never even get started if you wait for that, IMO.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk