From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-30 12:44:08
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Hi Thorsten,
>> I made two changes to range, which should only affect gcc-2.95 and
>> - in begin.hpp and end.hpp I applied some of the Borland workarounds
>> to gcc-2.95 as well
>> - in iterator_range.hpp, I removed some Borland workarounds which
>> were causing iostreams to fail on Borland, and which did not seem to
>> be necessary. The same tests passed with and without the workarounds.
> btw, does this mean that we should declare gcc-2.95 as a supported
I'm not sure -- I only use iterator_range, which worked before on gcc-2.95 even
though some other tests failed. I'll run the regression tests on that platform.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk