[boost] Re: [range] Borland and GCC-2.95 workarounds for iostreams

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-30 14:26:06

"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:d7flcf$mfa$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
| Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
| > Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
|
| >> btw, does this mean that we should declare gcc-2.95 as a supported
| >> platform?
| >
| > I'm not sure -- I only use iterator_range, which worked before on
| > gcc-2.95 even though some other tests failed. I'll run the regression
| > tests on that platform.
|
| Unfortunately most of Range still doesn't work with gcc-2.95. I have a 
feeling I
| could make it work if I spent a day, but I don't have a day :(

yep, that's the problem. people who actually use boost commercially
with such compilers should do thet job if they care.

-Thorsten