From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-01 13:35:53
"Tom Brinkman" <reportbase_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However,
> the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have been approved on
> a similar limited number of reviews.
Obvious questions in response to this...
How many reviews are sufficient?
What proportion in favour/against acceptance is acceptable?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk