|
Boost : |
From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-01 14:00:02
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]>
>
> I still disagree. Depending on default initialization is like depending on
> init of static variables to 0. If you really need a special init value, be
> explicit and say so. I see no logic to the default construct of complex to
What's wrong with relying on static initialization to get you a
zero?
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk