[boost] [parameter] Patch for Tru64/CXX65

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-03 11:31:52

Hello,

attached patch fixes the current regression failure for the basics test. 
The code in questions contains a non-working workaround for this compiler, 
the patch removes this workaround as well. Ok to commit?

Markus

Index: basics.cpp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/parameter/test/basics.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 basics.cpp
--- basics.cpp	16 May 2005 12:58:48 -0000	1.8
+++ basics.cpp	3 Jun 2005 16:29:10 -0000
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 
 namespace test
 {
-  
   // A separate function for getting the "value" key, so we can deduce
   // F and use lazy_binding on it.
   template <class Params, class F>
@@ -39,8 +38,13 @@
           
       typename boost::parameter::binding<
         Params, index_, int
-      >::type i = p[index | 999];
-          
+      >::type i =
+#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__DECCXX_VER, BOOST_TESTED_AT(60590042))
+        p[test::index | 999];
+#else
+        p[index | 999];
+#endif
+
       p[tester](n,v,i);
 
       return 1;
Index: basics.hpp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/libs/parameter/test/basics.hpp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 basics.hpp
--- basics.hpp	15 May 2005 10:15:56 -0000	1.2
+++ basics.hpp	3 Jun 2005 16:29:10 -0000
@@ -88,13 +88,6 @@
 {
     return values_t<Name,Value,Index>(n,v,i);
 }
-  
-#if defined( __DECCXX_VER )
-  && BOOST_WORKAROUND(__EDG_VERSION__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(245))
-  // Some kind of nasty ambiguity arises here -- is there an index in
-  // the global namespace?
-      using test::index;
-#endif 
 
 } // namespace test