Re: [boost] Re: Re: stride iterators and matricies

From: christopher diggins (cdiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-03 13:51:54

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]>
>
> Here's my version:
[snip]

That code looks great! Any reason it can't go into boost as is? I would like 
to see that and a version which takes the step as a template parameter, to 
improve efficiency when the step size is known at compile-time.

-Christopher Diggins