Re: [boost] Re: compressed_pair requirements?

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-04 10:08:25

On Jun 4, 2005, at 5:49 AM, John Maddock wrote:

>> The solution is to not pass non-PODs through ellipses, of course. ;-)
>
> You won't find any disagreement from me!  I'm testing your suggested 
> fix now.
>
> Doug, assuming this change causes no regressions locally is it 
> acceptable to commit?

This one worries me slightly, but it's okay to commit.

        Doug