[boost] Re: compressed_pair requirements?

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 11:30:45

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> You have to take some steps to eliminate the formation of
> pointers-to-references, i.e. a partial specialization on compilers
> that support it and some wretched mess everywhere else.
> 

Fortunately, the existing is_member_function_pointer implementation 
already provides the wretched mess. I was merely suggesting a small 
tweak to the existing implementation to avoid the 
non-POD-through-the-dots badness.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com