From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 11:40:34
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:18:38PM +0100, Paul A Bristow wrote:
> | Andy Little wrote:
> | > Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However,
> | > the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have
> | been approved on a similar limited number of reviews.
> I think this low number is because people feel they MUST put quite a lot of
> work into a review.
> Provided reviewers state when they only glanced at the submission, I think
> that the sum of all these 'quickies' would be helpful, when considered in
> combination with a few 'in-depth' reviews.
That's good to know, as I might be able to contribute quickies. My time
has been severely limited recently.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk