[boost] Re: Iterator adaptors <-> boost::bind interaction

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-07 05:27:26

Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> I would say transform_iterator should return by value by default and
>> there should be an explicit notation to request by reference semantics
>> (if applicable).
>
> David, any reply on the above? I'd like to come to some kind of
> resolution on the outlined problem since it is real and hurting.

I don't think there's much danger in transform_iterator itself, is
there?  Isn't this all in make_transform_iterator?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com