[boost] RealNetworks has one more comment on boost.tokenizer

From: Sebastien Martel (smartel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-08 12:19:34

Hello boosters,

      Thank you for looking over the comments I posted.

      I completely forgot to mention one important thing
      boost.tokenizer 1.32 introduced that broke us when we moved from boost
      1.31 :

      Here is my post on the matter on boost-users

      http://tinyurl.com/bc4av

      Essentially, the assign optimization (nice gains, thank you)
      adds requirements on the container type. We have a custom string
      classes that does not support it, but has a += member.

      So any use of tokenizer on these fails to compile. I sadly had to
      revert back to 1.31 behavior until this gets resolved.

      Thanks,
      -seb

      ( please cc me when replying, I do not follow boost_at_list )
-- 
Best regards,
 Sebastien                          mailto:smartel_at_[hidden]