From: Sebastien Martel (smartel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-08 12:19:34
Thank you for looking over the comments I posted.
I completely forgot to mention one important thing
boost.tokenizer 1.32 introduced that broke us when we moved from boost
Here is my post on the matter on boost-users
Essentially, the assign optimization (nice gains, thank you)
adds requirements on the container type. We have a custom string
classes that does not support it, but has a += member.
So any use of tokenizer on these fails to compile. I sadly had to
revert back to 1.31 behavior until this gets resolved.
( please cc me when replying, I do not follow boost_at_list )
-- Best regards, Sebastien mailto:smartel_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk