From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-11 04:44:19
> Well, all changes may (in certain circumstances) keep a reviewer from
> "fully evaluating the library". Some clarification of the guidelines would
> not be amiss.
Apologies for being behind the curve with this, but ideally you would have
left the original review version unchanged, and posted an "_updated" version
that folks could look at if they wanted. However, now it's done probably
best to leave it as it is, otherwise we'll get even more churn.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk