Date: 2005-06-12 09:03:20
Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
> By the way, take this in no way as criticism of your library, which I
> have not formed an opinion on yet. I am only stating my belief that
> iostream implementations are tangental to the primary work of creating a
> Boost socket stream library.
If I didn't want criticism on my library, I wouldn't show it to other
Criticism is welcome.
I'm have an alternative version of that code, in the form of a
"Boost.Network" library, suitable for the Sandbox. As soon as I've won
my battle against the documentation building system, I'll upload it.
Then, I'll concentrate on trying to show what kinds of coding patterns
are made much easier with IOStreams syntax. That's my game.
-- Pedro Lamarão
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk