Re: [boost] [typeof][result_of] Separated at Birth?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-12 11:24:37

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Just to make sure that we are on the same page, did you mean we
>> mis-report const non-references as const lvalues?  For example, if a
>> function is declared as "const int foo()" (which makes little sense
>> to me, but possible), LVALUE_TYPEOF would yield: "const int&".
>
> Yes, that's what I meant.  I'm more concerned with returning const
> class types, for what it's worth.

As well you should be :-) because rvalues of non-class types are never 
cv-qualified, 3.10/9.