From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-13 18:41:00
Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Mind if I just "merge" some of this into the next revision?
That is, along with another sentence in the Acknowledgements section, of course.
> is_function_type<Tag,T> is an MPL Integral Constant. The type member is the
> identity of its specialization and not listed explicity because it's part of the
> concept. It won't hurt, I guess.
Should mean: Listing them explicity won't hurt (not the fact that they are not).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk