Re: [boost] [function types][review] (repost with new formatting)

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-13 18:41:00

Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Mind if I just "merge" some of this into the next revision?

That is, along with another sentence in the Acknowledgements section, of course.

> [...] 
> is_function_type<Tag,T> is an MPL Integral Constant. The type member is the 
> identity of its specialization and not listed explicity because it's part of the 
> concept. It won't hurt, I guess.

             ^^^^^^
Should mean: Listing them explicity won't hurt (not the fact that they are not).