From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-14 15:08:04
Caleb Epstein wrote:
> Lets try this one more time, but I'll rephrase my question.
> Does anyone object to me adding a new header <boost/endian.hpp> for
> this purpose? Or perhaps <boost/detail/endian.hpp> as it would be
> undocumented. This is all that is required to make the
> gcc-3_4_3-sunos target 100% pass on all tests.
I say go ahead, in detail/.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk