From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-15 12:42:17
David Abrahams wrote:
> Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I'm confused. I was pretty sure Ralf was running Boost.Python on that
> compiler. Ralf?
Hmm, the tests have been failing for 1.32 as well. It was the same problem.
>>I had a look at the standard what should happen in this case, but after
>>reading [temp.over] I'm not really sure if we don't indeed end up with two
>>candidate functions for the overload resolution of foo(), one being the
>>overload itself and the other the specialization of the function template
>>for int. Could anyone please clarify this?
> The non-template function should be preferred. The function template
> should never even get instantiated.
Could you perhaps point me to the section in the standard where this is
specified? [temp.over] doesn't require this, I think.
>>As for a possible workaround, replacing the overload with a specialization
>>of the function template would work, AFAICT. Would such a patch be accepted?
> If it's a localized patch somewhere in Boost.Python, it might. But
> this sounds like the sort of problem that would require sweeping
> fixes. No?
I'll have to try to be sure, but I think you are right, it will require
tweaking much code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk