|
Boost : |
From: Brian Braatz (brianb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-17 09:06:13
GOT IT!
see below:
> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of Brian Braatz
> a(nonintegral) sequence?
>
> > "Brian Braatz" <brianb_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > >
> > > I am looking for a way to basically do this:
> > >
> > > typedef vector<int,float,float,char,int,int,int,double> types;
> > > typedef vector<int,float,char, double> expected;
> > > typedef unique_all< types, is_same<_1,_2> >::type result;
> > >
> > > BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( equal< result,expected > ));
> > >
> > >
> > > (note the examples I am using use integral types, in my situation
I
> am
> > > not using integral types)
> > >
> >
> [David Abrahams Writes:]
> > If you don't need to preserve order, just stick them in an
> > mpl::set<>. In fact, you might be able to use a set<> to begin with
> > and just skip the vector<>.
> >
> > Otherwise, I would write a little algorithm based on the
> > implementation of remove_if (which you can find nicely described in
> > the online reference manual). Instead of passing along a predicate
at
> > each stage of the fold<>, pass along a set<> that accumulates the
> > elements you've already seen. When the next element is already in
the
> > set<>, skip it.
> >
> > Try working that out for yourself; it'll be good for you ;-)
[Brian Braatz Writes:]
OK I finally figured this out, thanks in BIG PART to David sending me
down the right path of thinking.
I am also going to save this mail, and double back around at some point
and write this by hand. (I still a little shaky with the full bore
compile time recursion code- and (as David suggests) this would be an
excellent way to get better)
I have written a small sample and am including it in this mail. I am
doing this for the benefit of someone in the future searching the list
archives looking for a solution.
here is the working solution:
this sample takes a list of types in a sequence and removes the
duplicate types
struct A {};
struct B {};
struct C {};
struct D {};
void RemoveDupsFromSequence()
{
// 10 elements in dups, but only 4 unique types
typedef vector<B,D,A,B,C,B,D,B,C,C>::type dups;
// copy it into a set<>,
// the insert<> applied to set<> will
// ensure the same type cannot be added twice
typedef copy<
dups
, inserter< set< >, insert<_1,_2 > >
>::type result;
// Prints 10
cout << "dups size " << mpl::size<dups>::value << endl;
// Prints 4 - result is now something like set<A,B,C,D>
// Note: actual order is unknown\indeterminate for result
cout << "result size " << mpl::size<result>::value << endl;
}
BIG THANKS to David Abrahams :)
Brian
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk