Boost logo

Boost :

From: Phil Richards (news_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-17 10:59:35

On 2005-06-17, Phil Richards <news_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[a patch]

Much as I feel as though I'm talking to myself in this thread,
that's never stopped me before.

The current regression log on shows:
gcc 4.0.0
Pass: 84% (123 warnings)
Fail: 16% (213)

The patch changes this to the more (but not completely) accurate:
gcc 4.0.1-pre20050607
Pass: 97% (220 warnings)
Fail: 3% (38)

Most of the new warnings are actual error output from failed
compilations that compiler_status appears to want to link to.
I'll take a look at that next...

8 of the fails are due to the lack of test-type information in
the test_log.xml file.

If nothing else, it makes gcc look a bit healthier...


change name before "@" to "phil" for email

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at