Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 10:18:02

Next message: Brian Braatz: "[boost] Wiki MPL FAQ Idea -was [RE: MPL: clever way to remove *all* duplicates in a(nonintegral) sequence?]"
Previous message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Boost regression notification (2005-06-17)"
In reply to: Christophe Prud'homme: "[boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Next in thread: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Reply: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Reply: razeh: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"

On Jun 18, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> Am I using boost::signals the wrong way? has boost::signals some added
> features that reduce its performance ?

The latter. The "slot groups" feature really slows Signals down.

Doug

Next message: Brian Braatz: "[boost] Wiki MPL FAQ Idea -was [RE: MPL: clever way to remove *all* duplicates in a(nonintegral) sequence?]"
Previous message: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Boost regression notification (2005-06-17)"
In reply to: Christophe Prud'homme: "[boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Next in thread: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Reply: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"
Reply: razeh: "Re: [boost] performance test between boost::signals and sigc++-2.0"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk