From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-19 07:22:44
Jody Hagins wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:37:06 +0200
> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>BCC is broken for all sorts of reasons. It is _not_ supported and does
>>_not_ speak enough ISO-C++. Btw. I know a workaround for the problem
>>regarding function references but the lack of partial specialization
>>for member function pointers is much worse.
Good news: I just found out this _can_ be worked around, so there can be full
support for BCC without the need for typeof (emulation)!
Not sure I get it done in the next version already, though.
> However, BCB is used by a number of boosters, ...
...finding workarounds ;-) ??
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk