|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 15:18:29
"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> news:d9pfcd$pc8$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
>> Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>>
>>> [SNIPPED]
>>> Isn't 0x564 the version macro number for this compiler?
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>
>> That is the correct version number, but shouldn't the test be
>>
>> BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x564) )
>>
> IIUC that produces the workaround to be activated even for earlier versions
> of the Borland compiler,
> but 5.5.1 in particular handles the code very well (in fact, I developed the
> library in that compiler).
Really? How sad for Borland!
Well,
BOOST_WORKAROUND(__BORLANDC__, > 0x551)
&& BOOST_WORKAROUND( __BORLANDC__, BOOST_TESTED_AT( 0x564) )
Looks like what you need, then.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk