Re: [boost] [function_type] Tag types documentation

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-05 10:23:55

Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>> 
>>>     The Function Type library uses tag types to represent a type's properties,
>>>     such as its calling convention or whether it is variadic.
>>>
>>>How do I make this valid English (plural tag types, singular type)?
>> 
>> 
>> It's fine as is.  
>
> Great!
>
>> I'd call this library "Function Types" (plural, like
>> "Type Traits") but that that's just me.
>> 
>
> Well, actually I prefer Function Types too (btw. the current draft contains a 
> class template with the same name as the namespace)...
>
> So - is our rationale good enough to violate the Boost guidelines at this point?

Which guideline are you proposing to violate?  What rationale?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com