Re: [boost] [function types] New tag type logic [update]

From: Dave Gomboc (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-07 00:56:30

> > > Can you cite a source for that?
> > 
> > http://wwwnew.towson.edu/ows/proref.htm
> 
> I've never before heard the "one, clear, unmistakable noun"
> discussion and was never taught that identification with 
> antecedents was that strict.  Certainly you should remove 
> troublesome ambiguity, but must one always remove all possibility?

It's clear that this habit is common; people write like this all the
time.  Let's face it: on a newsgroup, one can get away with it.
(Heh. :-)

However, for formal documentation, writers should adhere to the
rules that prohibit the presence of such ambiguities.

Dave