From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-12 15:33:02
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> The ability to accommodate these unlikely scenarios has to be balanced against
> usability. If a test for GCC with major version < 3 has to use "3000000,"
> chances are good that a test will be misspelled and a needed workaround will not
> be applied.
It is possible to put an expression to calculate the 3000000 in this case into a
#define BOOST_VERSION(major,minor,patchlvl) \
(major * 1000000 + minor * 1000 + patchlvl)
#define BOOST_GCC \
#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_GCC,< BOOST_VERSION(3,2,3))
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk