Re: [boost] Bug in boost::thread

From: Jost, Andrew (Andrew_Jost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-13 00:31:38

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Turkanis
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:38 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Bug in boost::thread
> 
> David Bergman wrote:
> > I don't understand. What about the quite explicit message in 
> > 
> http://www.boost.org/doc/html/threads/implementation_notes.html#thread
> > s.impl
> > ementation_notes.win32 ?
> 
> I'm not sure that "Implementation Notes" is a good subject 
> heading for a descriptions of implementation limitations. 
> "Implementation Notes" sounds like it will contain a 
> discussion of how the library interface is implemented, 
> rather than how the library fails to implement the interface.

I agree.

> I'd prefer "Limitations of the Current Implementation."
> 
> Jonathan
>

Or, "Known Problems"

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>